Using Market Forces to Solve the Water CrisisCEO and Co-Founder of Water.org and WaterEquity
[Editor’s Note: This is the fifth article in BRINK’s special series on water risk.]
Achieving affordable access to safe water and sanitation for all has been one of humanity’s most intractable problems. This is despite the fact that billions of us take these services for granted. We have known how to deliver affordable, safe water for more than 100 years yet for more than 2.5 billion people these services are absent.
Some of the reasons this problem persists include the high cost of infrastructure, weak governance, lack of proper operations & maintenance, unrealistically low water tariffs, poor water utility management, poorly targeted subsidies and misguided development assistance.
Yet, today, like every day, people are finding water somewhere. They are coping and making decisions with incredibly difficult trade-offs. Do they drink the water from the brown stream outside their home or walk five miles to a “cleaner” stream? Or do they purchase water of marginally better quality from a private water vendor that will cost 25 percent of their income that day? Should they wait for nightfall and defecate alongside the railroad tracks or pay to use a public toilet?
Beyond the day-to-day decisions, there are also difficult long-term decisions for people to make. Should they purchase a simple water filter that might cost two month’s wages? Should they purchase a rainwater harvesting system that might cost six month’s wages? Should they save for months if not years to pay the connection fee to gain piped water access to the local utility? Should they make the substantial investment in building a toilet at their home or installing a simple latrine?
While access to clean water and sanitation is still a massive problem for billions, over the past two decades more than 2 billion people have managed to cope with these trade-offs in a way that has allowed them to gain access to improved water supplies and sanitation. While some have benefitted from top-down aid and subsidies, we know many more have secured improved water and sanitation through their own financial sacrifices and tapping into informal credit markets—loan sharks. These realities and our insights inspired us to think more in terms of system change than delivering heavily subsidized solutions to those living in poverty.
By nudging financial systems, hundreds of millions of people could gain access to water and sanitation even in the absence of subsidies at the household level. To set this in motion, capital for water and sanitation services for those living at the base of the economic pyramid must be ubiquitous and affordable.
We have learned that even those earning as little as $1.25 per day or less will access financing to help them seek new options for meeting their needs. We believe that hundreds of millions of those lacking critical water and sanitation services can be reached by continuing to remove financial and other roadblocks, allowing them to move from unserved potential beneficiaries to empowered customers.
Hundreds of millions could gain access to water/sanitation even in the absence of subsidies at the household level.
For decades, the sector has approached household level water and sanitation access for the poor through raising money and disbursing it in the form of subsidies to cover the cost of wells and toilets. This charity-led approach is not sustainable or scalable at a level needed to confront the global water crisis. For a large segment of the population in need, it is unnecessary to rely upon charity dollars.
Water.org has made great strides in demonstrating the viability of the market at the base of the economic pyramid that could be unleashed if fueled by affordable capital. The research of others points to a multi-billion dollar market that is primed to tap into affordable finance to secure water and sanitation solutions. Addressing the water and sanitation needs of those that can participate financially will leave charity dollars for those living in abject poverty.
To truly understand the impact of this approach, we follow Grace’s story in Kenya:
Grace and her family had always hoped to afford a rainwater catchment system and water tank. She imagined the day when her young daughter wouldn’t have to walk to collect water. Grace and her daughter used to collect water from a nearby stream and it was a time-consuming chore, during which she dreamed of a better way. Through Water.org’s WaterCredit, Grace and her husband got a loan to purchase a rain catchment system and a water tank. Now, each rainy day brings an abundance of water such that Grace has enough and can share it with her neighbors, improving the lives of her family, and the community where they live.
- Part One of BRINK’s special water risk series:
- Critical Need for a More Sustainable Approach to Water Management
- Part Two of BRINK’s special water series:
- The Age of Resilience: Building a Sustainable Water Future
- Part Three of BRINK’s special water risk series:
15 Countries Account for 80 Percent of Global River Flood Risk
- Part Four of BRINK’s special water risk series:
The Energy-Water Challenge