Marsh & McLennan Advantage Insights logo
Conversations and insights from the edge of global business
Menu Search

BRINK News is transitioning to This Moment platform on as of March 31, 2023. Read the update here.

In Practice

The Corporate Conundrum on How to Handle Culture Issues

Are we witnessing the final throes of brand neutrality? Quite possibly. In the United States, the climate has radically changed in the wake of George Floyd’s death and the January 6 uprising at the Capitol. Companies may want to resist being pulled into these political maelstroms — but they are getting increasingly tough to avoid.  

The Risk of Political Contributions to a Brand

Political contributions have become tantamount to a supply chain albatross. If companies underwrite certain political leaders and causes — even modestly — they now own the consequences. Consumers, shareholders, stakeholders and other constituents now gauge corporate brands, at least in part, by their political affiliations. These days, your brand consists of much more than just the products and services that you sell.     

In the spring of 2020, when the federal government struggled in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, I observed that “crisis abhors a vacuum” and predicted that private entities would step into the breach, and they did, from pharmaceutical companies to professional sports leagues. 

For more than a century, power rotated between Wall Street and the nation’s capital. When the federal government failed to act, corporations filled the void. And when the government stepped in, corporations reverted to their Coolidge-in roots: the business of business. 

What Is the Proper Role of a Corporation?

For decades, America has debated the merits of the proper size and role of government. But nowadays, the debate is increasingly about the proper role of the private sector. That is what generates the heat now.  

Milton Friedman argued two generations ago that “a firm’s sole responsibility is to its shareholders.” If his conviction was ever true, it no longer is — not in an era when a huge percentage of consumers demand their brands to take a stand.  

In the United States, corporations’ initial business-as-usual reaction toward Georgia’s new voter restrictions was telling — and something of a cautionary tale about the complexity of the new “rules.” Some of Georgia’s biggest companies weighed in against the bill before it reached the statehouse floor, but then stayed mum as it got closer to enactment. Certain Georgians viewed their relative silence as complicity. Suddenly, corporations were seen as supporting voter suppression, including criminalizing the act of giving water to voters standing in line. 

It is no longer sufficient to say that you’re in business just to maximize profits — there has to be other rationale.

The storm began to rage: In short order, Major League Baseball, not known these days for its pioneering social advocacy, said it would take the 2021 MLB All-Star Game away from Atlanta. MLB was signaling to officials in such states as Arizona, Florida and Texas — not to mention Washington, D.C. — that North Carolina’s 2016 experience of hemorrhaging $3.6 billion in business revenue because its legislature passed an anti-LGBT law was no aberration. 

So how does a company survive the crosscurrents of today’s turbulent political waters? Here are some guidelines. 

  1. Perceptions trump reality. The Georgia law is complex; in some ways, it extends voting hours and access, and in others, it clearly targets traditional Democratic strongholds. If your company is going to weigh in on a highly controversial issue, make sure your team is interdisciplinary. If just your public affairs or legal executives are looking at it, they will miss perception issues the way your brand and communications professionals alone would miss legal issues. Silos are no longer an effective way to make decisions.  
  2. Business is more than just profits. It is no longer sufficient to say that you’re in business just to maximize profits — there have to be other rationales. Michelin sells safety, not tires. Starbucks sells a lifestyle. Apple sells creativity. Nike sells the inner athlete. Each company knows precisely why it is in business, which allows them to approach theology and be more than just a brand. When you read something in the Bible that you don’t believe, you don’t lose faith. You just carve out that one story, that parable. The same is true for brands that are disciplined enough to have an umbilical connection with their customers. Know thyself and to your customers be true.
  3. Track cultural trends like your business life depends on it — because it does. Too many businesses approach big data like an accountant, instead, analyze it as if you worked at the CIA. A couple of coincidences may portend a trend. Have people who understand business, politics and the cycles of history track the news, including, of course, social activity. Lots of screaming can often be ignored, while sometimes a single high-authority blogger or lawsuit can mean change is afoot.
  4. There is no Las Vegas — nothing “stays here.” What happens in Georgia can happen in Texas. What happens to a competitor can happen to you. Plan for it, and view what happens to others as your laboratory. Activists look for companies domiciled in battleground states. If you are headquartered there, there is no excuse to be surprised.
  5. Don’t fret calls for boycotts. The reason the 1965-1970 grape boycott led by Cesar Chavez captured the nation’s attention and changed buying habits is because of the rarity of the strategy. Today, there is a call for a national boycott nearly every hour, one of the most recent, of course, being against Major League Baseball. Calling for a boycott is a click away; acting on them takes both tremendous organizing and a public willing to be impassioned by the cause more than the inconvenience of new purchasing habits. Over the past few years, boycotts and threats of boycotts by more progressive causes seem to be more effective than those by the right. Nike did exceptionally well after calls for boycotts when it embraced Colin Kaepernick. It was no accident. They planned for it.

Yes, the United States is divided — but perhaps not as much as many believe. The polls suggest that many Americans support the direction that the current administration is taking on such issues as infrastructure, COVID vaccination, environmental stewardship and other issues. Your mission is to carefully find your niche and understand your brand, your audiences and your community. No matter what you do, don’t expect smooth sailing. We live in a volatile era that shows little sign of calming down.

Richard Levick

Chairman and CEO of LEVICK @richardlevick

Richard Levick is chairman and CEO of LEVICK, a global advisory firm providing a full range of strategic communications consulting services to companies and nations involved in critical high-stakes issues. He can be reached at:

Get ahead in a rapidly changing world. Sign up for our daily newsletter. Subscribe